Accessibility Testing in Manual Testing: Use Cases & Techniques

Accessibility Testing in Manual Testing: How Does It Ensure Inclusive Design?

Have you ever wondered what happens when a visually impaired user tries to interact with your app, or when someone relies on keyboard navigation to complete a task? If your software isn’t accessible, you risk excluding a significant portion of your users.

That’s why accessibility testing in manual QA is essential. It ensures that digital products are usable by everyone, regardless of physical, cognitive, or situational limitations. Unlike automation, manual accessibility validation brings human judgment into the process, spotting gaps that tools alone can’t detect.

What Is Accessibility Testing in Manual QA
Why Accessibility Testing Matters
Core Goals of Accessibility Testing
When to Perform Accessibility Testing
Key Techniques for Accessibility Testing
Manual vs Automated Accessibility Testing
Device and Environment Accessibility Checks
Common Accessibility Issues Identified in Manual Testing
Best Practices for Accessibility Testing
Industry Use Cases of Accessibility Testing
Real-World Example
FAQs on Accessibility Testing
Final Thoughts
Contact Us

What Is Accessibility Testing in Manual QA

Accessibility testing ensures that applications are designed for inclusivity. It verifies whether people with disabilities — such as vision, hearing, motor, or cognitive impairments — can use the product effectively.

In manual QA, testers validate not only compliance with standards like WCAG, Section 508, and ADA, but also real-world usability. For example, a screen reader might technically read button labels, but a human tester can judge whether the phrasing makes sense to users.

Why Accessibility Testing Matters

Accessibility is no longer just a “nice-to-have”; it’s a legal and ethical necessity. Poor accessibility can result in lawsuits, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.

Beyond compliance, accessibility testing broadens your user base. By ensuring inclusivity, you reach millions of potential users who otherwise face barriers. In practice, accessible software improves usability for everyone, not just those with disabilities.

Core Goals of Accessibility Testing

Accessibility testing has goals that go beyond passing a checklist. It focuses on enabling real, equal participation for all users.

It ensures that applications are perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. These four pillars, defined by WCAG guidelines, form the foundation of effective accessibility.

Perceivability – Information must be available to users through multiple senses (visual, auditory, tactile).
Operability – Interfaces should be navigable using different input methods, like keyboards or screen readers.
Understandability – Content and interactions must be simple and consistent.
Robustness – Applications should work reliably across assistive technologies and platforms.

When to Perform Accessibility Testing

Accessibility validation should not be left to the end. It’s most effective when embedded throughout the development lifecycle.

Early testing reduces rework costs, while late-stage validation ensures compliance before release. In Agile environments, accessibility checks are built into every sprint.

During the design phase to validate inclusive UI/UX concepts
At development checkpoints, to prevent accessibility regressions
Before release to ensure legal and compliance readiness
Post-release audits for continuous accessibility improvements

Key Techniques for Accessibility Testing

Manual accessibility testing involves structured techniques to uncover usability barriers.

Technique	Description	Best Use Case
Screen Reader Testing	Validate compatibility with tools like NVDA/JAWS	Visually impaired user workflows
Keyboard Navigation Testing	Ensure full functionality without a mouse	Form submission, navigation flows
Colour Contrast Testing	Check legibility against WCAG contrast ratios	Text readability for low-vision users
Focus Order Testing	Validate logical tab order across UI components	Multi-step forms, navigation menus
Captions & Transcript Checks	Ensure audio/video content has accessible text	E-learning, media applications

Manual vs Automated Accessibility Testing

Automated tools like Axe, WAVE, or Lighthouse are useful for scanning large codebases. They quickly detect missing alt text, ARIA roles, or contrast issues.

However, automation cannot judge real usability. Only manual testers can confirm whether a form label makes sense, whether a keyboard shortcut is intuitive, or whether screen reader narration flows naturally. A hybrid approach is ideal: automation for coverage, manual validation for accuracy.

Device and Environment Accessibility Checks

Accessibility isn’t limited to desktops. Mobile devices, tablets, and even smart TVs need to support inclusive interactions.

Manual testers validate across environments to ensure apps respond well with screen readers like TalkBack (Android) or VoiceOver (iOS), and that responsive designs don’t create barriers for users with disabilities.

Common Accessibility Issues Identified in Manual Testing

Accessibility defects often slip through functional checks because they do not break features for the average user. Manual testing uncovers these hidden barriers.

Missing or incorrect alt text for images
Poor colour contrast for text and backgrounds
Inconsistent heading structures
Non-descriptive link or button labels (“Click here”)
Elements not accessible via keyboard navigation
Missing captions or transcripts for video/audio content

Best Practices for Accessibility Testing

Adopting structured practices ensures comprehensive accessibility validation.

Align testing with WCAG 2.1 and Section 508 standards
Involve diverse users, including people with disabilities, in validation
Use real assistive technologies during testing, not just simulators
Validate both compliance and usability
Perform regular audits as software evolves

Industry Use Cases of Accessibility Testing

Accessibility testing is critical across industries, each with unique inclusivity requirements.

E-commerce: Ensuring checkout flows are accessible to all users
Banking: Providing accessible account management tools for compliance
Education: Guaranteeing inclusive access to e-learning platforms
Healthcare: Making patient portals usable for visually or cognitively impaired users
Media & Entertainment: Validating captions, transcripts, and player controls

Real-World Example

An online learning platform faced high dropout rates from visually impaired students. Manual accessibility testing revealed that course materials lacked proper screen reader support.

By fixing these issues, the platform improved retention by 22% and gained positive recognition for inclusivity.

FAQs on Accessibility Testing

Q1: How is accessibility testing different from usability testing?
Usability testing focuses on overall user experience, while accessibility testing ensures that people with disabilities can access and use the product effectively. Accessibility is about inclusivity and compliance, while usability is about general satisfaction.

Q2: Can accessibility testing be automated?
Automation can detect common issues like missing alt text or poor colour contrast, but it cannot validate human-centred factors like logical content flow or screen reader narration. Manual validation is essential for accuracy.

Q3: What standards guide accessibility testing?
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1), Section 508 (US), and ADA compliance are most commonly used. These standards ensure legal and ethical inclusivity.

Q4: When should accessibility testing be done?
Ideally, accessibility testing should be embedded throughout the development lifecycle, from design mockups to post-release audits. Early validation prevents costly rework.

Q5: Who benefits from accessibility testing?
While it primarily benefits users with disabilities, accessible design improves experiences for all users, including those on mobile devices, older users, or people in low-light or noisy environments.

Final Thoughts

Accessibility testing in manual QA ensures inclusivity, compliance, and user trust. It bridges the gap between technical correctness and real-world usability by validating software against both standards and human expectations.

At Testriq QA Lab, we combine structured accessibility frameworks with real-user validation to make software truly inclusive. Our approach ensures that every user can interact with your product confidently, regardless of ability.

Contact Us

Worried that your app may not be inclusive for all users? At Testriq QA Lab, we make accessibility testing a business advantage.

Our services include:

Manual accessibility audits with real assistive technologies
WCAG and Section 508 compliance validation
Cross-device and cross-environment accessibility checks
Reporting frameworks with actionable recommendations

Email: contact@testriq.com
Request a Free Accessibility Consultation → Talk to Our Experts

👉 📩 Contact Us

Accessibility Testing in Manual Testing: Ensuring Inclusive Design | Testriq QA Lab