ISTQB + ISO 9001 + ISO 27001 Certified Partner

Cypress Testing Services — E2E + Component Coverage

Production Cypress suites for modern web apps — E2E + component tests in one stack, network stubbing for deterministic runs, Cypress Cloud parallelisation, custom commands that read like a domain DSL, and accessibility scans rolled into the same run. Built by testers who've scaled Cypress suites past 2,000 specs without breaking the in-browser DX.

Talk to a Cypress Lead Read case studies

When to use Cypress

Dev-led React / Vue / Svelte / Next.js apps with TypeScript stack
Teams wanting E2E + component tests in one tool
Network stubbing + offline-deterministic runs
Accessibility scans inline with functional tests (axe-core)
Cypress Cloud for parallelisation + flake-detection dashboards

What is Cypress?

Cypress is a JavaScript-native testing tool that runs inside the browser — giving it a uniquely fast feedback loop, direct DOM access, and built-in auto-waits. Cypress 10+ added first-class component testing alongside E2E, so unit-to-integration-to-E2E lives in one stack. The trade-off historically was single-browser (Chrome family only) — that's now resolved via WebKit (Safari engine) + Firefox support. Cypress remains the strongest choice for dev-led JS / TS teams that want fast in-browser DX.

Our Cypress testing services

Each service plugs into your existing CI / observability stack rather than replacing it.

Cypress E2E Suite Setup

Production-shape config — custom commands, fixtures, intercepts, retry-on-failure, retry-on-flake, plugin selection for tasks + reporting.

Cypress Component Testing

Component-level tests for React / Vue / Angular / Svelte / Next.js, replacing or augmenting JSDOM-based unit tests for real DOM behavior + visual regressions.

Network Stubbing & Mocking

Deterministic E2E via cy.intercept() — request matching, response stubbing, throttling, offline simulation. Tests that pass or fail on test data, not on backend health.

Cypress Cloud + Parallelisation

Cypress Cloud setup, sharded parallel runs, flake-detection dashboards, smart orchestration, and on-prem-friendly alternatives where Cloud isn't available.

Accessibility Scanning (axe-core)

axe-core integration with cy-axe, inline WCAG 2.1 AA rule scans during functional runs, plus dedicated a11y-only specs for deeper audits.

CI / CD Integration

GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Jenkins / Azure DevOps wiring, sharded matrix runs, PR-gating with Cypress dashboard links, artifact reporting.

Cypress ecosystem we integrate with

Tooling on its own is noise. The value is in the pipeline it sits in.

Frontend frameworks

React
Next.js
Vue 3
Nuxt
Angular
Svelte
SvelteKit
Solid

Component test runners

Cypress Component
Vitest
Jest
Storybook

Visual regression

Percy
Applitools
Chromatic
Argos

Accessibility

axe-core
cy-axe
pa11y

CI / CD

GitHub Actions
GitLab CI
Jenkins
CircleCI
Azure DevOps

Cloud + orchestration

Cypress Cloud
Sorry Cypress
BrowserStack
Sauce Labs

Why Testriq for Cypress

Cypress since 4.x

Testriq has run Cypress in production engagements since Cypress 4.x — through the breaking changes of 5/6/10, the move to component testing, and the multi-browser landscape. We know the upgrade landmines + how to navigate them.

Suite hygiene from day one

Custom commands library, fixtures discipline, network-intercept patterns — established at the architecture phase so the suite doesn't drift into untested intercepts and flaky waits at 500 specs.

Cypress Cloud cost optimisation

Sharding strategy, retry-on-flake budget, smart orchestration — we deliver suite runs that are fast + cost-controlled, not parallelism turned to 11.

ISO 9001 + ISO 27001 controls

Test data + screenshots + Cypress Cloud project access controlled per our ISMS. For regulated-industry clients, evidence packs are traceable.

Who You’ll Actually Work With

Not an account manager who forwards your questions. The people below are part of the QA team, and one of them will be on your project.

Pooja Katkar

Test Lead

Runs test planning and execution on client engagements, and owns the defect triage your team sees day to day.

Ragini Kumari

QA Specialist

Specialises in e-learning platforms and user-experience testing — the cases where a build passes every check and still frustrates the person using it.

Aakash Yadav

QA lead & business strategy manager

Works on the tooling and automation side how a suite is built so it still runs cleanly a year later.

Meet the rest of the team

This page was last reviewed by the Testriq QA team on October 28, 2026.

How You Can Engage Us

Four ways to bring this work in-house or hand it over. Pick the one that matches how your team is set up.

Dedicated QA Team

A fully-managed QA function — QA lead, automation engineers, manual testers, plus performance and security specialists.

Best when you want the outcome owned end to end.

Hire a QA Engineer

ISTQB-certified manual, automation, performance and security engineers, engaged in days rather than months.

Best when QA is a permanent part of your roadmap.

QA Engineer On-Demand

Flex-up and flex-down capacity against a pre-qualified bench. You pay for the hours used, not the headcount carried.

Best when the workload arrives in bursts.

QA Staff Augmentation

Engineers embedded in your existing team and working under your management, with replacement guaranteed.

Best when you own the process and need capacity.

Every model runs under the same ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 27001 controls. Talk to us about which one fits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cypress vs Playwright — which one for our new project?

Cypress wins for dev-led JS/TS teams that want the in-browser DX + component testing in one tool. Playwright wins for true multi-browser including Safari at scale, async-friendly Page Object architecture, and Microsoft-maintained first-party network interception. Both are excellent — we recommend based on team composition + cross-browser scale need, not on framework loyalty.

Can Cypress handle cross-browser (Safari / Firefox)?

As of Cypress 13+, yes — Chrome + Edge + Firefox + WebKit (Safari engine) are supported. Real Safari (on macOS) is still better served by Playwright or cloud grids. For most apps, Cypress's WebKit coverage is sufficient; for B2C apps with significant Safari traffic, we often pair Cypress for dev-iteration with a Playwright smoke suite for true Safari.

How do you handle flaky Cypress tests?

Cypress flake usually traces to three root causes: (1) un-intercepted async network calls, (2) missing waits on derived state (not just element-visible), (3) test-data leakage between specs. Our framework patterns lock all three down via cy.intercept() discipline, fluent retryability, and per-spec data setup/teardown via cy.task().

Do you use Cypress for API testing?

We use cy.request() for inline API setup + assertions inside E2E specs, and standalone API suites in Postman / Newman / Pact for contract testing. Cypress is great for E2E + light API; for heavy API contract testing it's not the right tool.

How does Cypress Cloud integrate with our CI?

Cypress Cloud connects via record key — any CI runner (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, etc.) can call `cypress run --record` and Cloud orchestrates parallel sharding across runners. Results appear in the Cloud dashboard with flake detection, run-grouping, and PR-linked artifacts.

What's the typical suite migration timeline?

From a 500-spec legacy Cypress suite to a stabilised one: 4-6 weeks. From Cypress to Playwright or vice versa: 6-10 weeks depending on suite size, framework reuse opportunities, and team familiarity.

Run your Cypress suite with people who've shipped it before

Talk to a Testriq lead — we'll plug into your existing Cypress stack or stand one up for you, gated to your CI pipeline + audit posture.

Get a Cypress proposal