ISTQB + ISO 9001 + ISO 27001 Certified Partner

Appium Mobile Testing Services — iOS + Android Test Automation

Cross-platform mobile automation with Appium — real-device + emulator/simulator coverage across iOS (XCUITest driver) and Android (UiAutomator2 driver), native + hybrid + mobile-web flows, cloud device farms for matrix coverage, and tight CI/CD integration. Built by testers who've shipped Appium suites on apps with 50M+ installs.

Talk to a Appium Lead Read case studies

When to use Appium

Cross-platform mobile app testing (iOS + Android in one suite)
Native, hybrid, and mobile-web flow coverage
Real-device farms (BrowserStack / Sauce Labs / pCloudy / AWS Device Farm)
Teams migrating from XCUITest + Espresso silos to a unified framework
Mobile + web Selenium hybrid suites sharing Page Object patterns

What is Appium?

Appium is the W3C WebDriver-compliant automation framework for mobile — driving native iOS apps via XCUITest, native Android apps via UiAutomator2 (and Espresso when needed), hybrid apps via WebView bridging, and mobile-web via Safari + Chrome drivers. One framework + one set of language bindings (Java, Python, JS, C#) across both platforms makes it the default cross-platform mobile QA tool.

Our Appium testing services

Each service plugs into your existing CI / observability stack rather than replacing it.

Appium Framework Setup

Multi-platform framework — desired-capabilities config, Page Object for iOS + Android, screenshot + log + device-recording on failure harness, retry-on-flake.

Real-Device + Emulator Coverage

BrowserStack / Sauce Labs / pCloudy / AWS Device Farm integration, local device lab setup, capability matrix tuning across OS versions + device classes.

iOS XCUITest Driver Setup

Xcode + Apple Developer + provisioning-profile configuration, iOS WebDriverAgent build pipeline, real-device test signing, Safari mobile-web integration.

Android UiAutomator2 + Espresso

UiAutomator2 driver setup for black-box tests; Espresso driver for instrumented in-process tests where deep state introspection is needed.

Mobile CI / CD Pipeline

GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Bitrise / App Center / CircleCI wiring with cloud-device-farm sharding, parallel matrix runs, JUnit + Allure reporting.

Performance + Battery + Network Profiling

App performance metrics (cold-start, FPS, memory), battery-drain profiling, network-condition throttling — measured during the same Appium runs.

Appium ecosystem we integrate with

Tooling on its own is noise. The value is in the pipeline it sits in.

Drivers

XCUITest (iOS)
UiAutomator2 (Android)
Espresso
Safari
Chrome
Flutter driver

Language bindings

Java
Python
JavaScript / WD.js
C#
Ruby

Device cloud

BrowserStack App
Sauce Labs Real Device
pCloudy
AWS Device Farm
Kobiton
HeadSpin

CI / CD

GitHub Actions
GitLab CI
Bitrise
App Center
CircleCI
Jenkins

Reporting

Allure
Extent Reports
ReportPortal
TestRail
Xray

BDD

Cucumber
SpecFlow
behave
Karate

Why Testriq for Appium

iOS + Android, not just one side

Many partners are strong on Android but weak on iOS (the harder, more provisioning-heavy platform). We run both — including Xcode provisioning, WebDriverAgent rebuilds, and the iOS-specific flake patterns nobody else seems to know about.

Cloud-farm cost optimisation

Device-farm minutes get expensive fast. Our sharding patterns + smart device-selection cuts cloud-farm spend 30-50% vs naive parallel-everything strategies.

Real-device + emulator hybrid

Some tests should run on emulators (fast, cheap, parallelisable); some need real devices (sensors, battery, biometrics, NFC, ARKit). We design the test pyramid accordingly — not force-fit everything to real devices.

ISO 9001 + ISO 27001 controls

Mobile app builds, test data, device-farm credentials, and screenshots handled per our documented ISMS. Especially relevant for fintech + healthcare apps.

Who You’ll Actually Work With

Not an account manager who forwards your questions. The people below are part of the QA team, and one of them will be on your project.

Pooja Katkar

Test Lead

Runs test planning and execution on client engagements, and owns the defect triage your team sees day to day.

Ragini Kumari

QA Specialist

Specialises in e-learning platforms and user-experience testing — the cases where a build passes every check and still frustrates the person using it.

Aakash Yadav

QA lead & business strategy manager

Works on the tooling and automation side how a suite is built so it still runs cleanly a year later.

Meet the rest of the team

This page was last reviewed by the Testriq QA team on October 28, 2026.

How You Can Engage Us

Four ways to bring this work in-house or hand it over. Pick the one that matches how your team is set up.

Dedicated QA Team

A fully-managed QA function — QA lead, automation engineers, manual testers, plus performance and security specialists.

Best when you want the outcome owned end to end.

Hire a QA Engineer

ISTQB-certified manual, automation, performance and security engineers, engaged in days rather than months.

Best when QA is a permanent part of your roadmap.

QA Engineer On-Demand

Flex-up and flex-down capacity against a pre-qualified bench. You pay for the hours used, not the headcount carried.

Best when the workload arrives in bursts.

QA Staff Augmentation

Engineers embedded in your existing team and working under your management, with replacement guaranteed.

Best when you own the process and need capacity.

Every model runs under the same ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 27001 controls. Talk to us about which one fits.

Related testing services

Specialised services that pair closely with this one.

Frequently Asked Questions

Appium vs Espresso vs XCUITest — when to use each?

Appium for cross-platform suites sharing one framework. Espresso for Android-only when you need deep in-process state introspection. XCUITest for iOS-only when you need tight Apple-platform integration. Most teams run Appium for the bulk of E2E + a smaller Espresso / XCUITest set for unit + instrumented integration tests.

Real devices or emulators — which should we invest in?

Both. Emulators / simulators for the bulk of regression (cheap, fast, parallelisable). Real devices for sensor-dependent flows (camera, GPS, biometrics, NFC), battery profiling, and final-mile smoke. The right ratio is typically 80/20 emulator-to-real-device, but it varies by app type.

Which cloud device farm is best?

BrowserStack App + Sauce Labs Real Device are the leaders for breadth. pCloudy is competitive for India-market-focused apps. AWS Device Farm is cost-effective if you're already on AWS. We help pick based on your device-matrix needs, security requirements (some farms have stronger isolation than others), and budget.

What about Flutter + React Native apps?

Appium drives Flutter apps via the Flutter driver, and React Native apps via the standard UiAutomator2 / XCUITest drivers (React Native renders native components). For RN, suite patterns are essentially native-Android + native-iOS. For Flutter, we usually pair Appium with Flutter Integration Test for deeper widget-tree assertions.

How do you handle flaky Appium tests?

Mobile flake has different root causes than web: device-state contamination, animation-not-settled timing, network-condition variability, OS-update behavior changes. We address via per-test device-reset, explicit animation-finished waits, network-condition pinning, and OS-version pinning in CI configuration.

Can Appium test mobile-web (browser) flows alongside native?

Yes — Appium drives mobile Safari + mobile Chrome via the standard W3C WebDriver protocol. Same Page Object patterns apply. For mobile-web-heavy apps, we sometimes pair Appium with Playwright (mobile emulation) for faster iteration + Appium for real-device validation.

Run your Appium suite with people who've shipped it before

Talk to a Testriq lead — we'll plug into your existing Appium stack or stand one up for you, gated to your CI pipeline + audit posture.

Get a Appium proposal